Beyond Your Walls

Beyond Your Walls: Managing AI-Related Third-Party Risks

Your AI security chain is only as strong as its weakest external link.

Modern enterprises no longer build AI capabilities entirely in-house. Instead, organizations increasingly rely on a complex ecosystem of third-party AI providers, from foundation model APIs and pre-trained components to fully managed AI services and specialized solutions. While this approach accelerates time-to-value and reduces technical barriers, it extends your risk perimeter beyond traditional organizational boundaries.

For CXOs navigating this landscape, third-party AI creates unique security challenges that traditional vendor management frameworks fail to address. The risks span from model vulnerabilities and data leakage to intellectual property complications and compliance blind spots, creating a complex risk landscape that requires sophisticated governance approaches, technical safeguards, and contractual protections.

Did you Know:
Security Challenges: According to a 2024 study by the Ponemon Institute, organizations experience 43% more security incidents involving third-party AI compared to internally developed systems, yet only 27% have implemented AI-specific third-party risk management processes.

1: The Expanding Third-Party AI Ecosystem

The AI vendor landscape has exploded in complexity and scope. Understanding this evolving ecosystem is the first step toward effective risk management.

• Foundation model providers: Organizations increasingly build applications on top of large language models and other foundation models from providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and cloud hyperscalers, creating dependencies on these critical infrastructure layers.
• Specialized AI vendors: Vertical-specific AI solutions addressing industry challenges like medical diagnosis, financial fraud detection, and predictive maintenance introduce domain-specific risks alongside their specialized capabilities.
• Model marketplaces: The emergence of model repositories and marketplaces where organizations can acquire pre-trained components introduces supply chain risks similar to those in open-source software but with AI-specific complications.
• AI development platforms: Low-code and no-code AI platforms that democratize AI creation within enterprises often connect to external services and models, creating hidden third-party dependencies that security teams may not detect.
• Data enrichment services: Third-party services that enhance training data with additional features, labels, or synthetic examples create potential data poisoning vectors and privacy exposures that extend beyond organizational boundaries.

2: Unique Risks of Third-Party AI

Third-party AI introduces distinct risks beyond traditional vendor concerns. These unique characteristics require specialized risk management approaches tailored to AI supply chains.

• Model vulnerabilities: Pre-trained models and components may contain vulnerabilities like adversarial examples, backdoors, or bias that propagate into your applications without detection during conventional security reviews.
• Data exposure risks: Sending data to third-party AI services for processing, inference, or fine-tuning creates potential exposure of sensitive information through model memorization, inference attacks, or direct breaches.
• Security opacity: The “black box” nature of many third-party AI models makes security assessment challenging, as internal workings, training methodologies, and potential vulnerabilities remain hidden from customers.
• Dependency concentration: Over-reliance on dominant AI providers creates systemic risk, as technical problems, pricing changes, or security incidents affecting these providers can simultaneously impact multiple critical business functions.
• Trust boundary expansion: Integrating third-party AI significantly expands the trust perimeter, allowing external entities to influence or even control critical decisions and processes that were previously bounded within organizational systems.

3: The Business Impact of Third-Party AI Risks

Third-party AI risks directly translate to business impacts. Understanding these consequences is essential for appropriate prioritization and investment in risk management.

• Breach amplification: Security incidents involving third-party AI providers often affect multiple customers simultaneously, creating heightened media attention and reputational damage compared to internal incidents.
• Scalable failures: When third-party AI components fail or are compromised, the impact scales rapidly across all integrated business processes, potentially affecting customer experience, operational efficiency, and strategic objectives.
• Sovereignty erosion: Excessive dependence on third-party AI can gradually transfer critical decision-making capabilities and intellectual property outside organizational control, creating long-term strategic vulnerabilities.
• Compliance cascades: Regulatory violations by third-party AI providers increasingly trigger derivative liability for their enterprise customers under expanding AI governance frameworks in major jurisdictions.
• Innovation hindrance: Inadequate third-party risk management can create defensive decision-making around AI adoption, slowing valuable innovation and digital transformation initiatives due to unaddressed security concerns.

4: Governance for Third-Party AI Risk

Effective third-party AI risk management requires specialized governance frameworks. These structures establish clear accountability and ensure appropriate oversight throughout the AI supplier lifecycle.

• Executive accountability: Designating specific C-suite responsibility for third-party AI risk creates organizational alignment and ensures appropriate prioritization of this emerging risk category.
• Risk classification framework: Developing AI-specific risk tiers based on potential business impact enables appropriate due diligence depth and ongoing monitoring for different types of AI providers.
• Cross-functional oversight: Third-party AI risk committees with representation from security, data science, legal, procurement, and business units enable comprehensive risk assessment and coordinated management.
• Inventory requirements: Establishing mandatory registration of all third-party AI components and services creates visibility into the full ecosystem of external dependencies.
• Board reporting: Implementing regular board-level reporting on significant third-party AI risks ensures governance at the highest organizational level for these strategic dependencies.

Did you Know:
INSIGHT: While 84% of enterprises now use at least one third-party AI system in critical business functions, less than 31% maintain a comprehensive inventory of these dependencies, creating significant blind spots in risk management.

5: Due Diligence for AI Providers

Traditional vendor assessment approaches fall short for AI providers. These specialized due diligence elements address the unique characteristics of third-party AI.

• Model development practices: Evaluating how providers train, test, and validate their models reveals potential security vulnerabilities, biases, and quality issues before integration into critical business processes.
• Data governance assessment: Examining how providers source, manage, secure, and process data identifies potential privacy, compliance, and security risks in the foundation of their AI offerings.
• Supply chain transparency: Assessing providers’ own dependencies on third-party models, data, and components reveals cascading risks that could affect the security and reliability of their offerings.
• Security architecture review: Examining technical safeguards for model protection, data isolation, and access controls identifies potential vulnerabilities in the provider’s security posture.
• Model documentation quality: Evaluating the completeness and accuracy of model documentation, including model cards, provides insight into the provider’s commitment to transparency and responsible AI practices.

6: Contractual Protections for AI Relationships

Standard contract templates are insufficient for AI providers. These specialized contractual elements create essential protections for third-party AI relationships.

• Incident notification requirements: Clear contractual obligations for providers to promptly notify customers of security incidents, model vulnerabilities, and data breaches enable timely response and risk mitigation.
• Model change management: Contractual requirements governing notification and testing for significant model updates prevent unexpected behavior changes that could affect security or business outcomes.
• Data usage limitations: Explicit restrictions on how providers can use data submitted for inference, fine-tuning, or other processing protect against unintended training data exposure and intellectual property complications.
• Audit and testing rights: Contractual provisions enabling security testing, vulnerability assessments, and compliance audits provide essential visibility into provider security practices.
• AI-specific service levels: Performance guarantees addressing not just availability but also accuracy, bias metrics, and response time create accountability for AI-specific quality dimensions.

7: Technical Safeguards for Third-Party AI

Technical controls provide essential protections when using external AI capabilities. These measures create defensive layers that persist even when third-party risks materialize.

• Input sanitization: Implementing technical controls that filter sensitive information from data sent to third-party AI services prevents inadvertent exposure of confidential content.
• Output validation: Automated scanning of responses from third-party models for security issues, harmful content, or unexpected patterns provides an essential quality control layer.
• Isolation architectures: Designing integration patterns that isolate third-party AI components from critical systems and sensitive data minimizes the impact of potential compromises.
• Monitoring and anomaly detection: Implementing continuous monitoring of third-party AI behavior enables early identification of potential security issues, drift, or performance degradation.
• Data minimization pipelines: Technical processes that reduce data sent to third-party services to the minimum necessary for task completion limit exposure while preserving functionality.

8: Resilience Strategies for Third-Party AI

Dependency on external AI creates resilience challenges. These approaches ensure business continuity even when third-party risks materialize.

• Failover capabilities: Developing alternative processing paths that can activate when third-party AI services experience outages, security incidents, or quality degradation prevents business disruption.
• Multi-provider strategies: Implementing architectural patterns that enable rapid switching between competitive AI services reduces concentration risk and creates negotiating leverage.
• Data escrow arrangements: Establishing mechanisms to recover training data and model weights if providers cease operations or change terms ensures business continuity in adverse scenarios.
• Graceful degradation design: Creating fallback modes where applications continue functioning with reduced AI capabilities during third-party service disruptions maintains essential business operations.
• Regular resilience testing: Conducting simulations of third-party AI provider failures, security incidents, and performance degradations validates the effectiveness of continuity measures before actual crises.

9: Ongoing Monitoring and Reassessment

Initial due diligence is insufficient for managing third-party AI risk. These ongoing monitoring approaches address the dynamic nature of AI capabilities and risks.

• Continuous security scanning: Regular vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, and security reviews of third-party AI integrations identify emerging risks as both threats and technologies evolve.
• Performance tracking: Systematic monitoring of accuracy, reliability, and other quality metrics detects degradation that might indicate security issues or other emerging problems.
• Compliance verification: Regular audits confirming ongoing adherence to regulatory requirements prevent compliance drift as both regulations and AI capabilities evolve.
• Threat intelligence integration: Incorporating AI-specific threat intelligence into vendor monitoring enables early identification of potential vulnerabilities and attack patterns targeting specific providers.
• Contract compliance verification: Systematic checks ensuring providers fulfill contractual obligations regarding security, data usage, and performance create accountability throughout the relationship lifecycle.

10: Model Supply Chain Security

AI models have complex supply chains similar to software. These approaches address the unique security challenges of model provenance and integrity.

• Model provenance tracking: Implementing systems to document the origin, lineage, and modification history of all third-party models creates accountability and visibility into the AI supply chain.
• Cryptographic verification: Utilizing digital signatures and integrity checks for model files and weights ensures that models haven’t been tampered with between provider creation and organizational deployment.
• Component scanning: Implementing automated tools that analyze third-party models for vulnerabilities, backdoors, and security issues provides technical validation beyond vendor assertions.
• Training data verification: Assessing the quality, representativeness, and potential biases in training data used by third-party models identifies risks that might otherwise remain invisible.
• Supply chain mapping: Documenting all dependencies in the AI supply chain, including data sources, pre-trained components, and development tools, creates visibility into cascading risk relationships.

11: Data Protection in Third-Party AI

Data shared with third-party AI requires special protection. These approaches safeguard information throughout its lifecycle in external AI systems.

• Data classification alignment: Ensuring third-party providers understand and adhere to organizational data classification and handling requirements prevents misapplication of security controls.
• Tokenization and anonymization: Implementing technical measures that protect sensitive data before it reaches third-party systems reduces exposure risk while preserving analytical utility.
• Residual data management: Establishing protocols for the secure deletion or return of organizational data from third-party AI systems after processing prevents unauthorized retention or reuse.
• Differential privacy techniques: Applying mathematical methods that provide provable privacy guarantees for data used in third-party AI training or fine-tuning prevents individual data extraction.
• Data rights management: Implementing technical controls that enforce usage limitations even after data reaches third-party environments provides persistent protection throughout the data lifecycle.

12: Regulatory Compliance for Third-Party AI

The regulatory landscape for AI is rapidly evolving. These approaches help navigate complex compliance requirements across third-party relationships.

• Regulatory mapping: Documenting how third-party AI relationships fulfill specific requirements across applicable regulations simplifies compliance management and auditing.
• Cross-border considerations: Understanding jurisdiction-specific requirements for AI providers helps navigate the complex landscape of international AI regulation and data transfer restrictions.
• Documentation standards: Standardized documentation of third-party AI risk assessments, security controls, and monitoring satisfies the increasing regulatory emphasis on demonstrable governance.
• Audit coordination: Establishing efficient mechanisms to support regulatory audits that span organizational boundaries reduces compliance overhead and improves responsiveness.
• Regulatory horizon scanning: Monitoring emerging AI regulations enables proactive adaptation of third-party requirements before compliance deadlines create time pressure.

13: Building Organizational Capability

Managing third-party AI risk requires specialized expertise. Developing these capabilities is a strategic investment in effective risk management.

• Cross-disciplinary expertise: Building teams with combined knowledge of AI technology, cybersecurity, vendor management, and legal requirements creates the multidisciplinary capability needed for effective oversight.
• Training programs: Developing specialized education addressing the unique aspects of third-party AI risk builds crucial knowledge across procurement, security, legal, and business teams.
• Centers of excellence: Establishing dedicated groups with deep expertise in AI risk assessment creates valuable internal resources that business units can leverage during vendor selection and management.
• Knowledge sharing mechanisms: Creating formal and informal channels for sharing insights about third-party AI risks accelerates organizational learning and prevents repeated issues.
• Career development paths: Defining growth trajectories for professionals specializing in AI risk management helps attract and retain the scarce talent needed for this emerging discipline.

14: Ethical Dimensions of Third-Party AI Risk

Third-party AI creates unique ethical challenges beyond security and compliance. These approaches address the broader societal and ethical implications of external AI dependencies.

• Value alignment assessment: Evaluating how third-party AI providers’ stated values and actual practices align with organizational ethical principles identifies potential reputational and operational conflicts.
• Ethical use verification: Ensuring contractual and technical controls prevent organizational data from being used for third-party AI development in ways that violate ethical principles or stakeholder expectations.
• Transparency requirements: Establishing standards for how third-party AI providers must disclose their development practices, limitations, and potential biases enables informed decisions about appropriate use cases.
• Accountability mechanisms: Implementing clear responsibility structures for ethical issues that emerge from third-party AI prevents critical incidents from falling into organizational gaps.
• Stakeholder communication: Developing appropriate disclosure frameworks for third-party AI usage creates transparency with customers, employees, and other stakeholders about how external AI influences organizational decisions.

Did you Know:
EMERGING TREND: The average enterprise now connects to 17 different external AI services across its application portfolio, a number that has tripled since 2022, dramatically expanding the third-party AI risk surface that CXOs must manage.

Takeaway

Managing AI-related third-party risks requires a comprehensive approach that spans governance, due diligence, contractual protections, technical safeguards, and ongoing monitoring. As organizations increasingly rely on external AI capabilities to drive innovation and efficiency, the security and compliance implications extend far beyond traditional vendor management concerns. CXOs who establish robust third-party AI risk management not only protect their organizations from immediate threats but also create a foundation for responsible AI adoption that balances innovation speed with appropriate risk controls.

Next Steps

• Conduct a Third-Party AI Inventory: Identify all external AI dependencies across your organization, including foundation models, specialized services, and embedded components.
• Establish AI-Specific Due Diligence: Develop a specialized assessment framework for evaluating AI providers that addresses the unique risks of model vulnerabilities, data exposure, and ethical considerations.
• Implement Technical Safeguards: Deploy input filtering, output validation, and monitoring capabilities that provide protection layers when using third-party AI services.
• Develop Contractual Standards: Create AI-specific contract templates and requirements that address model performance, data usage, security incidents, and audit rights.
• Build Cross-Functional Governance: Form a dedicated team with representation from security, data science, legal, and business units to oversee third-party AI risk management.

For more Enterprise AI challenges, please visit Kognition.Info https://www.kognition.info/category/enterprise-ai-challenges/